Comments on: Don’t talk to me about your fucking arduino* http://petehindle.com/2010/05/18/dont-talk-to-me-about-your-fucking-arduino/ Pictures and stuff from a guy who likes coffee. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:08:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Pete Hindle http://petehindle.com/2010/05/18/dont-talk-to-me-about-your-fucking-arduino/#comment-209 Wed, 19 May 2010 18:23:48 +0000 http://www.petehindle.com/?p=732#comment-209 Next time I see a really blatant example, I’ll bring it to your attention.

]]> By: Brian http://petehindle.com/2010/05/18/dont-talk-to-me-about-your-fucking-arduino/#comment-208 Wed, 19 May 2010 17:52:54 +0000 http://www.petehindle.com/?p=732#comment-208 In some cases the terms are descriptive, they describe the media, but not the message(so i am agreeing with you). As two oil paintings will not neccesarily be similar(or even comparable), this holds for arduino, or gps or processing based works. And the media dosent suggest anything about the quality of the piece, just because it contains arduino donsent make it good.

Pete, can you find some text descriptions where these media are in the forefront, would like to see.

Favorite work currently (but is it art?) is http://www.eyewriter.org/ there is technology there but it is subservient to the Idea.

]]> By: brendadada http://petehindle.com/2010/05/18/dont-talk-to-me-about-your-fucking-arduino/#comment-207 Tue, 18 May 2010 21:34:09 +0000 http://www.petehindle.com/?p=732#comment-207 Who? Who?

]]>